Several highlight pieces deserve mention for how they crystallize the project’s themes. One is a triptych titled “Contract”: three images arrayed like legal stipulations. The first shows a dress laid flat on a table—its label visible, stitched with an uncanny mirror-image phrase: “DO NOT LOVE.” The second is a close-up of hands signing a paper, but the signature is deliberately smudged into a lipstick kiss. The third is an empty chair under a spotlight, the shadow of a silhouette on the wall suggesting a person who has just left. Combined, the triptych reads as a meditation on consent and commerce, the ways bodies are negotiated in exchange economies both monetary and affective.
The work’s title, returning like a refrain—ROE-253 -MONROE- Madonna- 2024 W...—can be taken as an instruction: read the fragments, perform the connective labor. It also signals an openness; the ellipsis at the end gestures beyond 2024, beyond a single exhibition or catalogue. This is intentionally non-teleological. Momoko does not propose a final verdict on icons or agency; she stages an ongoing conversation, one whose contours will shift with new audiences and new contexts.
If there is a through-line, it is this: identity is not a simple inheritance but a set of tools, sometimes chosen, sometimes thrust upon us, always worked over. Monroe and Madonna are stars whose light has been split by time and audience; Momoko recombines those rays into something that glints differently depending on the angle of approach. The work leaves us altered—not by converting us to a single truth, but by enlarging the questions we might ask. Momoko Isshiki ROE-253 -MONROE- Madonna- 2024 W...
Beyond institutional walls, ROE-253 reverberates in conversations about feminism, pop culture, and the economies of visibility. It has prompted think pieces about the ethics of archival work, debates on appropriation, and, in quieter quarters, private reckonings. Young performers and visual artists have cited the suite as permission to fold their own contradictions into their practice—to admit that performance can be both survival and strategy.
There is a deliberate choreography to the title that arrests the imagination. ROE—an echo of law and origin, of eggs and beginnings—frames the piece as something that negotiates boundaries: between creation and interpretation, between public myth and private anatomy. The number 253 anchors it to a specificity that resists total mythologizing; it insists this is not merely legend but a constructed artifact with its own registry. -MONROE- calls up the ghost of an icon, a silhouette of classicism and vulnerability; Madonna folds in a layered hymn of reinvention and provocation. 2024 W... traces a temporal anchor with an ellipsis, suggesting a work that remains unfinished, a thought continuing beyond its printed edges. Together the elements promise a project of collision—identity as palimpsest, performance as excavation. Several highlight pieces deserve mention for how they
Another is a live piece, “Echo Chamber,” wherein Momoko sits at a dressing table surrounded by monitors playing different versions of the same interview—each edited to highlight different affectations. Viewers wander among small stations equipped with sterile headphones and a note: “Choose how she sounds.” The mechanized choice asks the audience to consider how editing constructs personality and how our consent to certain mediated images is always a participation in their making.
ROE-253 -MONROE- Madonna- 2024 W... is therefore less an answer than a ritual of attention. It trains a gaze to see the seams, the stitches, the price tags hidden in glamour; it teaches us to listen for the echoes of persona in our own mirrors. When the lights dim and the crowd disperses, the images do not settle into tidy nostalgia. They haunt. They demand that we consider what we will do with the icons we inherit—whether we will sanctify them, cannibalize them, or use them to refashion something that belongs to us, however provisionally. The third is an empty chair under a
There is also a domesticity here that grounds the spectacle: a thread of personal archive running through the work. Momoko includes fragments of handwritten notes, receipts, a crumpled photograph of someone’s mother at a seaside pavilion. These items operate like thresholds into intimacy, reminding us that the machinery of celebrity is built upon very human accumulations—love notes, small betrayals, the smells of kitchens and hotel rooms. That juxtaposition—the mythic beside the ordinary—creates a humbling empathy. ROE-253 refuses the cold distance of iconography by insisting on its scaffolding: the lived, the messy, the quotidian.