Critical reception: Some might praise her for challenging norms and giving a voice to marginalized groups. Others could criticize her for being too explicit or controversial. It's balanced in the article to present both sides.
Wait, I need to check some facts to make sure they're accurate. For example, confirming the years she started exhibiting and the specific details of her major works. Also, verifying the titles to avoid typos. Maybe include a quote from her to add depth. Also, mention any notable exhibitions or awards if available.
For the introduction, I should highlight her notoriety and the main themes she addresses. Then, the biographical section needs to mention her birthplace and career beginnings. She was born in Madrid in 1971 and started showing in the mid-90s. She's part of the feminist art movement, which is important to note.
Major works: "El Pervertido Honrado" (The Honest Pervert) is one. What's it about? Probably a performance or installation dealing with societal hypocrisy around sexuality. Also, "The Flesh is Holy" from 2000, which used her own body as a canvas. Other installations like "The Body as a Weapon" (2005) and "Fornicating with the City" (2007) might be key pieces. I should describe each briefly, their themes, and their impact.
Also, the term "The Honest Pervert" – I should clarify if that's a title of a specific work or an overall concept. It might refer to a concept she's known for, where she addresses societal hypocrisy regarding sexuality and identity, hence the paradox of being "honest" yet "perverted" in the context of norms.